Blog

  • Identity vs. Image

    Every company perceives themselves differently. They have a mission, values, and organizational culture that sets them apart from other organizations. Based off of these values, each company constructs a brand identity in order to communicate those values to their target audience. On the flip side, every brand has an image that goes along with their identity. A brand’s image is the public perception of the brand, and how they view their organization. The identity is simply the face that the organization puts on for the public. Anything and everything from an organization’s public relations, to the symbols and color patterns used in advertising contributes to the construction of brand identity.

    A lot of what an Integrated Marketing Communication practitioner does is mediating this relationship between the brand (identity) and the consumer (image). The overall goal is to construct a singular, consistent message to send the target audience that is concise and to the point. However, there are numerous challenges to overcome in order to achieve this goal.

    The first issue is external versus internal audiences. Organizations have multiple audiences to appease, and because of this, an organization’s message can become somewhat ambiguous. The external audience refers to those outside the organization, typically the consumer. Without support from this external audience, your sales will decrease, and ultimately put your company at risk of going out of business. That being said, you must also keep in mind certain internal audiences that also keep your organization in business. This audience could be investors, parent companies, and various organizations who you have gone into business with. A hypothetical example of a problematic situation pertaining to this issue could be the consumer’s desire for an organic, or reliable product at a low price, while also dealing with investors who want to keep cost of production down while still utilizing cheap materials in order to turn a larger profit. At what point will you no longer be able to honestly say that the quality of your product is superior when constructing advertising campaigns. To summarize, the challenge is to construct one message that keeps multiple parties with varying interests happy simultaneously.

    idenity_vs_image2

    Another issue that is evident among almost all consumers, is false representation by corporations. Many perceive corporations to have a true identity that goes unchanged over time, despite contrasting advertisements and public relations. An example can be seen with Starbucks Coffee. They have been accused of being a “greenwashed” company, meaning they put out disinformation to present an environmentally responsible public image. Corporate social responsibilities for any organization can be taken with a grain of salt, but the issue of transparency is a major concern for consumers. It is the IMC practitioner’s job to not only ensure that one clear and consistent message is being sent to the external audience, but that it is transparent, and ethically sound.

    aaeaaqaaaaaaaaymaaaajdfim2vkm2fhlthinjgtngy2yi1hytu5lta0ymi4zgzknmvkma

    The major challenge of an IMC practitioner is to successfully integrate all aspects of an organization’s communication into one “package” for the consumer, while communicating consumer feedback right back to the organizations. This why I describe an IMC practitioner as being a “mediator” between an organization, and its external audience. On the organizational side, it can sometimes be difficult to construct one singular message, when you’re working with all communication departments of an organization such as; public relations, advertising, customer relationship management, social media, etc.

    integrated-marketing-communications

    For prospective students, IMC can at first seem like a somewhat ambiguous concept, many associating it with a single entity such as advertising, or public relations. If we are to equate IMC to composing a musical score, social media could be the violin, advertising the trumpet, social media the piano, and so on. A composer’s job is to integrate all these musical instruments to compose one harmonious sound. Likewise, an IMC professional’s job is to integrate all platforms of communication within an organization in order to send a concise, clear and consistent message to an audience, and in turn relaying audience feedback. In order for an effective message to be sent to the audience, effective communication must exist within all areas of the organization. If all of these departments, or instruments, are not fluid and clear with their communication, the message will not have the desired impact on the target audience.

     

  • Like Nothing Ever Happened: Why Companies Change Their Logos

    index2

    As I’m sure most of you know by now, Subway had a pretty big scandal happen recently. Their former spokesman, Jared, got caught up in some pretty nasty business, and is now appropriately sentenced to a lengthy jail term. In an attempt to get past this, and to change their corporate identity, they changed their logo.

    index
    Not to be confused with a 90’s recycling PSA

    It’s shaped like an ‘S’! That’s very clever, get it?  The name looks different too. The colors are brighter, the lettering looks more modern, it’s like an entirely new Subway! That’s what they want you to think. Subway wants to remove any association that might have been made with Jared. An easy way to do that is to change the company’s symbol. After a change in marketing, it gives consumers new associations with a new symbol. But will it work? It should take more than just a logo change to influence people that you have moved past previous mistakes. It takes strong a strong marketing campaign as a whole to show people that you have changed.

    But maybe it doesn’t always require a screw up for one to change their logo. Just recently UNCW underwent a change in their sports logo.

    index3index4

    There was nothing truly wrong with the corporate identity of UNCW. No giant scandal, or confusion, or misrepresentation of the brand, so why change it? Maybe it has something to do with just the look of the old logo. It’s not particularly attractive, and looks like something straight out of the 90s. There could be possible repercussions to this. Maybe people won’t like this new change, or possibly not even recognize it. People may not connect the new logo with UNCW, which could hurt the brand.

    Recently, Apps have been taking part of this logo change as well. Both Instagram and Pandora have changed their corporate logos. Pandora did this in conjunction with the release of a new subscription service, Pandora Plus. While it’s no substantial change, it does obviously differentiate from the original.

    index7

    If there was a time to change a logo, it would probably be best to do so when you have something new to go along with it.  It provides consumers a reason to embrace your new company image and logo. It sets up a vision of success and  gives something for new and old customers alike something to be excited about. The only issue with this is Pandora obviously had to do this for a reason. With music streaming and downloading as easy as ever, Pandora has been struggling to keep pace with other music related business like Spotify. It will be interesting to see if the new logo and services help them keep pace with the competition.

    Could this lead to new issues in terms of identity? Will people accept or reject the new logo, and in turn reject the new identity the corporation or institution is trying to project? Are people influenced by a logo change, or does it take much more than that? When is the best time to refurbish the brand and its logo?

  • 5 Organizations That Destroyed Their Corporate Image

    5 Organizations That Destroyed Their Corporate Image

    Corporate trust and reputation matter. In fact, they are every company or organization’s most valuable assets. Trust and reputation go hand-in-hand, but they’re determined by a company’s corporate image. Corporate image is the mental picture that pops into your head when an organization is mentioned, and it continually changes based on their circumstances, media coverage, performance, etc. The right image creates a bond of trust between you and the marketplace and allows a company to achieve their goals. A company’s corporate image can change at the drop of a hat, and it did for these companies. Check out the stories of how these 5 companies managed to ruin their corporate image.

    Seaworld

    seaworld.jpgThe 2013 film “Blackfish” brought widespread public scrutiny to the morality of SeaWorld’s operations. Since the film’s release, the company’s woes have snowballed. Three whales died in 2015 in SeaWorld’s San Antonio, Texas location. While killer whales in the wild typically live 30-50 years, the most recent killer whale to die at SeaWorld didn’t even live to 19. In a likely attempt to polish its tarnished image and multiple protests, the company ended the killer whale show in its San Diego location this past year.

    Samsung

    giphy (1).gifSamsung recalled about 2.5 million Note 7s following complaints that its lithium-ion battery explodes while charging… and in cars, planes, houses, etc. The company also had to recall the first replacements it sent out to consumers after they proved just as dangerous #EPICFAIL. Samsung has taken out full page advertisements in major US newspapers to apologize for the Galaxy Note 7 scandal in which fire-prone batteries forced a global recall of the popular smartphones. The full-page ads in the Wall Street Journal, New York Times and Washington Post admitted the company fell short on its promise of delivering breakthrough technologies that enrich people’s lives. ‘For this we are truly sorry,’ the company said.

    BP

    bp-oil-spillThe Gulf oil spill is recognized as the worst oil spill in U.S. history. Within days of the April 20, 2010 explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico that killed 11 people, underwater cameras revealed the BP pipe was leaking oil and gas on the ocean floor about 42 miles off the coast of Louisiana. By the time the well was capped on, 87 days later, an estimated 3.19 million barrels of oil had leaked into the Gulf. Not cool BP. The fury over BP’s role in the Gulf spill erased the progress BP had made on the corporate responsibility fronts in the previous decade. And to make matters worse, Deepwater Horizon, a movie dedicated to their screw up, just opened in theaters across the country.  

    Chipotle

    giphyChipotle built its business over the course of more than two decades on a simple premise: being better than the fast-food chains. Its food is locally sourced-when possible- and grown and raised according to strict standards. Its employees are paid well compared to other restaurant chains, and even hourly workers receive benefits like paid vacation time and tuition reimbursement.

    The image that Chipotle cultivated over the years led to exceptional results… until their e-coli outbreak. Two separate outbreaks of the bacteria were investigated by the FDA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service and public health officials in several states. In the first outbreak 55 people were infected by the foodborne illness in 11 states, of which 21 were hospitalized. The second, smaller outbreak, infected five people from three states, of which one was hospitalized.

    Volkswagen

    bn-km332_euvw09_g_20150925121418Volkswagen’s is proof that a company’s reputation, and fortune, can change due to a single incident. For years, clean diesel was presented as an alternative to hybrid engines and was promoted as a major reason for consumers to buy cars with turbocharged direct injection (TDI) engines. Last year, the EPA accused VW of deliberately designing its vehicles to circumvent emissions tests. This was eventually confirmed, and overnight, the company went from an esteemed automaker to one of the most widely-disliked major companies. Volkswagen sales plummeted as a result, ruining their corporate image… at least for now.

    The Bottom Line

    Corporate image governs the way the world thinks about the organization. The right image creates a bond of trust between an organization and the marketplace, enables them to achieve their goals, and boost their overall earnings. It’s also important to note that if an organization doesn’t create their own image, we-the marketplace- will create one for them.

    Kyndall DySard

  • Donald Trump: Corporate Identity or Political Identity?

    urfiredDonald Trump, President of the United States, or “The Donald”? I know we are all tired of hearing about the election, but the marketing and communication strategies used by the new president-elect stand out from many before him. Donald Trump has been a public figure for years now, and over the course of this election, we have seen his image change from businessman to politician. How do we separate these identities? One appeal to some voters this election was the shift that Trump brought by not being the typical politician running for the presidency, but a real estate mogul and even reality television personality who decided to change his career path. (Who remembers “The Apprentice”?)

    Trump established himself as his own corporation through his real estate company, named the Trump Organization, owning golf courses, beauty pageants, and various other business ventures. He has been seen first and foremost as a businessman and many Americans have followed his business career for years. On this side, Donald Trump has promoted his corporate identity as being hardworking, entrepreneurial, grand, elegant, upper class, etc.

    Fast forward to last year when Trump decided to run for President of the United States. He traded in this logo:
    trump

    For this one:
    magalol

    At this point, Donald Trump had choices to make about what kind of identity to portray in the world of politics. While he remained as outspoken and blunt as ever, he had to create new aspects of his image. He has been known to have changing views throughout the years, but now he was forced to stick to one set of beliefs to run his campaign on. This included conservative, traditional views, tax cuts, stricter immigration policies, and reform of veteran care. Overall, you can see from his slogan that his political identity is that of improvement and restoration.

    What similarities do you see between Donald Trump’s corporate identity and his political identity? What differences do you see? What do you think are positive and/or negative outcomes of these similarities or differences? Do you think that these identities match his policies and actions? Let us know what you think!

  • Feel Good Shopping: 5 Companies That Give Back

    Feel Good Shopping: 5 Companies That Give Back

    It feels good to give back and make a difference in someone’s life, doesn’t it? People are always looking for opportunities to help out and give back in any way possible. As college students, we don’t normally have extra cash laying around. Many of us cannot give a large amount monetarily to support different causes and philanthropy efforts. If someone is asking for more than $10, the answer will usually be “No”.

    But giving back and supporting deserving causes has become easier than ever. Individuals can now contribute to the greater good just by shopping! In IMC we learn that consumers are the driving force behind many companies. The power of the dollar dictates what’s important (or not-so-important) to consumers. As more consumers choose to support businesses that are doing good, companies take notice and respond accordingly.

    Corporate social responsibility is becoming increasingly important in consumers’ shopping decisions. Providing a great product and shopping experience will only get you so far and now more than ever, if businesses really want their customers to keep coming back, they need to do more. They need to let their conscious consumers know that their dollars will be doing some good. This concept also relates back to corporate identity and image. A consumer is much more likely to buy a product from a business they deem as a charitable, ethical, and quality company than from another business who is not.

    In today’s market, there are a ton of awesome companies that are giving proceeds to deserving organizations, maintaining fair trade practices, or operating on buy-one-give-one models. If you’re someone who loves to shop, check out these 5 cool companies that give back and display above-average corporate social responsibility!

    Pedigree

    pedigreePedigree dog food built its brand by focusing on the need for people to adopt homeless dogs.  Funding the support and care of these animals and sponsoring a national adoption drive, Pedigree’s 2009 goal was to distribute $1.5 million in grants to 1,000 shelters and breed rescues. Pedigree donates one bowl of food to animal shelters every time it gets a Facebook fan, and it did the same when the company’s 2009 Super Bowl commercial was viewed online. Pedigree’s goal is to donate “4 million bowls of dog food annually”, enough to feed every shelter dog in America for one day. Their corporate identity resonates with animal lovers worldwide. Who wouldn’t want to buy a brand that helps out man’s best friend?

    Toms Shoes

    tomsThe well-known shoe company TOMS is another great example of a company with strong corporate identity. Owner Blake Mycoskie started Toms Shoes on the premise that for every pair of shoes sold, one pair would be donated to a child in need. TOMS Shoes recognized that consumers want to feel good about what they buy, and thus directly tied the purchase with the donation. In just four years, Toms Shoes has donated more than 400,000 shoes, evidence that consumers have clearly embraced the cause. It’s a brilliant corporate social responsibility model that many companies have adopted for themselves in the past few years. Their “One for One’ policy is a win-win for everyone involved!

     Bitty & Beau’s Coffee

    coffeeLocated right here in Wilmington off New Center Drive, Bitty & Beau’s Coffee markets itself as being “more than a cup of coffee”. When you buy your coffee beverage here, you are supporting people with disabilities and are their inclusion in the workplace! The shop is run by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Bitty & Beau’s Coffee currently employs 40 employees who create a warm and inviting atmosphere that makes every customer feel special. They create a culture where diversity is not just appreciated, it’s celebrated! This has become their corporate identity and this is something that customers will draw customers in and get them to skip the Starbucks.  Statistically, 70% of people with a disability in the nation are unemployed. By buying your coffee from Beau’s, you are supporting these individuals with disabilities! It is a coffee experience like no other.

    Patagonia

    patagoniaSince opening its doors in 1973, Patagonia has been a leader in the industry when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility.  Patagonia’s products are produced and made out of sustainable materials by ethical labor practices. In turn, Patagonia provides exceptional high-quality products that consumers can feel good about buying. They pride themselves on their apparel being made to last so that customers do not have to buy new clothing as frequently. They truly are business that accounts for the impact of their activities on customers, employees, communities and the environment. Additionally, Patagonia puts in the extra effort to promote fair labor practices and ensure good working conditions in our factories, which many companies fail to do. Fair Trade is one of the first tools they use at Patagonia to raise workers’ wages, improve their standard of living and move them closer to earning a living wage. Bottom line, Patagonia strives to always treat their workers and the environment with the respect. While their products are on the higher end of the price spectrum, you can feel better about your expensive purchase because you know you are supporting a good company.

     Burt’s Bees

    burts-beesBurt’s Bees is another NC based company that is providing good products and doing good out in the community! The company partners with Habitat For Humanity to build eco-friendly homes! In 2007 they established The Burt’s Bees Greater Good Foundation, which is funded by a percentage of their sales. Its goal is “to help empower non-profit initiatives whose efforts resonate with our own mission, particularly in the areas of natural health and well-being, the environment and social responsibility.” The company also gives back in another way by working to develop sustainable packaging made from recycled materials. In addition, they are a huge advocate for bees! The decline in the bee population over the past century impacts our eco-systems on multiple levels, so Burt’s Bees has tried to help raise awareness and bring attention to this issue. Their corporate image and identity is one that people recognize as an all-natural and eco-friendly company. So do yourself a favor and buy a stick or two of Burt’s Bees! Not only will it keep your lips moisturized this winter, but you can also know that you are supporting the bees at the same time! Now that’s something to buzz about!

    Are you more inclined to purchase a product from a company that gives back?

     

     

  • Sammy Seahawk and the Semiotic Triangle

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Ogden_semiotic_triangle.png/300px-Ogden_semiotic_triangle.png

    The semiotic triangle comes in different forms (although generally in one shape and size) but generally the idea is the same. You have a referent which is what is being represented, a symbol or image that represents that referent, and you have a thought or a concept which is everything you think of when you see that symbol.

    Then there is also the corporate image/corporate identity semiotic triangle. The referent stays the same. Instead of a symbol, you have a corporate identity which is everything that a brand is or does to define itself. Then, instead of a thought or concept you have a corporate image which is everything that you think of when you see or hear about that brand.

    Now let’s talk about Sammy.

    http://uncw.edu/ba/logos/2007_Sammy_Seahawk/Sammy_Seahawk_gif/Sammy.gifWhen you see Sammy, what comes to mind? Sammy Seahawk is the referent and this image of Sammy is our symbol. What is our thought or reference then? It can vary from person to person. When I see this symbol, I think of all of the students at UNCW and how Sammy is meant to represent them. Others may see him and think of athletics and might think of a memory of when they saw the Sammy Seahawk mascot at a game. It can even bring a feeling of joy when you see the symbol.

    So what does Sammy mean to you? What thoughts or emotions come to mind when you see our mascot?

     

     

  • Real vs. Fake

    blog-photo

    It’s about that time of year that relatives and friends ask us what gifts we want for the Holidays. Moms, dads, grandparents, siblings, cousins all ready to take on Black Friday – the ultimate day for holiday shopping and money saving. When asked, many of us immediately think of that purse we’ve been eyeing for months that we will never be able to afford or that pair of shoes that all of the trend-setters have.

    It makes one think, how many kids ask for expensive, designer things for holidays and birthdays that they certainly don’t need and maybe don’t even want. Ultimately the reason for what many want is the status symbol, not just a cute designer jacket that will last us through winters to come. We want that wealth identity. That false sense of pride. How did Prada, Burberry, Gucci or Louis Vuitton become the luxury brand that they are? Status, prestige and selectivity. The corporate image and identity of these brands have been shaped and based on the common understanding that only the highest of the highs own them. Its unrealistically attainable for the majority of the worldly population.

    realvsfake

    This is where the counterfeit market thrives. This is why there is a market for fake designer items – from handbags to travel sets to clothing. People want the symbol; they want the status but there is a disconnect when it comes to the means of reaching that status. So they buy cheap to portray expensive. In this, luxury brands lose pieces of their identity. The corporate identity that their company was built upon loses credibility through counterfeit and fake designer items.

    Going into this holiday season I challenge you to implore about two things, why do you want the things that you want? Why do you desire the expensive things that you do?

    There is an authenticity in luxury brands that is hard to find in the material industry. Is that the drive to purchase or is it the status associated with that corporate brand?